GARY YORK:
Since you met
God, has your opinion changed about abortion? Do you
believe abortion to be wrong, a sin or an error?
J. NEIL SCHULMAN: I don't like abortion,
personally, however I have always been and still am
pro-choice. But I think a lot of the modern feminist
rhetoric regarding a "woman's right to choose" is
hogwash. Why should a woman have the sole right to
choose whether or not to have a child, but the
father -- who is expected to be responsible for it
-- has no right to participate in the decision? That
sort of feminism offends my libertarian view that
there can be no duty where there is no choice. If
women want the sole right to choose whether or not
to have an abortion, and no man should be able to
tell a woman what to do with her body, then women
should lose all moral and legal claims for child
support from the men whose semen they appropriate to
achieve fertilization. But I also think a lot of
the "pro-choice" movement has a hidden agenda: to
eliminate human reproduction and kill off the human
species. It's just another facet of the left's
fundamental nihilism.
GARY YORK:
Most religions
agree that killing is wrong and that the killing of
babies is particularly egregious. Some would say
that “abortion’ is just a polite term for
“killing babies.” Do you agree?
J. NEIL SCHULMAN:
Well, what is a fetus? Is it a human body being prepared for the arrival
of a conscious soul, or is it a living being itself
from which a conscious soul emerges? The older view
is that the soul is not yet present until the first
breath of life, so a developing fetus is just a body
part. I don't see why the modern revisionist view
that the soul is present from the moment of
fertilization should be automatically adopted by
those who believe in reverence for life. I don't see
the religious right picketing blood banks. The part
is not the whole. A fetus does not necessarily have
a soul, and without a soul there can be no murder.
GARY YORK:
If the fetus is just a body part, why would you
dislike abortion?
J. NEIL SCHULMAN:
Because even though the body isn’t fully alive
without the soul, it’s designed in the image of God
and shouldn’t be regarded cheaply. It’s the same
reason I have esthetic objections to body-piercing
and self-mutilation.
By the way, I do think it’s ironic that the
right-wing arguments for fetal rights and the
left-wing arguments for animal rights are exactly
the same arguments... and both of them fail to ask
the fundamental question of what identity or nature
is required for a thing to acquire rights.
GARY YORK:
What is so
special about birth – exit from the womb – that
makes it proper to kill the prospective child before
that moment and improper afterwards?
J.
NEIL SCHULMAN: The old answer to that is that's
when the soul comes into the body. The libertarian
answer is that's the first moment when you have a
free individual with its own independent identity.
Back to
Gary York's interview with J. Neil Schulman |